Field Notes — astrocam v3

A logbook of what the instruments showed, and what we concluded from it.
All 11firstscope v1 2astrocam v3 4eclipticam v3w 5
The Milky Way from Surbiton, de-rotated
2026-10-13 · astrocam v3
astrocam-v3 · 7 to 9 Oct 2026 (2 nights) · 68° × 42°, looking north

Peter, on first seeing it: "that is so beautiful."

milky wayastrocamderotationstackingdrizzleexposurelimiting magnitudecassiopeiaperseussky glow
Newton's rings on astrocam, the glass cover shows itself
2026-10-10 · astrocam v3
astrocam v3 · night of 9 Oct 2026 · 75° × 42° (left panel, the whole frame)

Peter: "the glass cover for the camera is very thin and flat. probably the cause of the newton's rings."

astrocaminterferencenewtons-ringsflat-fieldglow-modelderotation
The camera works out which stars it is looking at
2026-09-22 · astrocam v3
astrocam v3

A camera that knows nothing about the sky can still be told where it is pointing and how sensitive it is, by the stars in its own picture. It works in two steps: first work out which stars these are, then look up how bright they are already known to be. Do both on one frame and the camera has calibrated itself against the sky it was photographing.

plate-solveastrometryphotometrycalibrationgaia
How dark is the sky in Surbiton?
2026-09-22 · astrocam v3
astrocam v3 · night of 21 Sep 2026

Looking at light pollution maps Surbiton is on the fringe of urban/suburban London, quite near to Heathrow Airport, M25 and M4 so a provisional brightness figure of 19 is reasonable. However, we can measure the actual brightness by identifying stars, looking up their measured magnitudes (brightnesses) and using that to calibrate our measurements. We also need to know the background darkness. We found that the brightness was closer to 18 than 19, 18.1 being a reasonable figure.

sky-brightnessplate-solvephotometrylight-pollutioncalibration